Three teams pull value from the same Twin
Which is why the same work stops being done three times in three places, in three formats that disagree with each other.
Compliance and Assurance
Keeps the company's assurance profile current: every certification, rating, standard and buyer-diligence response. Today that means running four preparation projects a year against overlapping requirements, each starting from a blank page. On a Twin it runs in hours or days rather than months, because the evidence for one scheme is already the evidence for the next.
Supply Chain and Procurement
Verifies and qualifies suppliers and counterparties against standards and internal requirements. The constraint is rarely judgement, it is time: reading what a supplier sent, checking it against your own policy, and doing that across a portfolio. Against a verified Twin it takes minutes rather than months, with the risk known before you commit rather than after.
Leadership and Finance
Sets the compliance budget and negotiates with banks, insurers and rating agencies. The hard question is which gaps to fund first. Insight shows which ones block the most revenue, so budget goes there rather than to whichever audit is nearest. Teams already on beSirius report €500k+ saved a year against the consulting projects it replaces.
The same document, three different jobs
A water management plan is evidence for an IRMA audit, an answer inside a customer questionnaire, and a data point in a CDP submission. Held in three places it drifts, and the three answers stop agreeing. Held once, it does all three jobs and stays consistent.
Compliance
Uses it as audit evidence, mapped to the requirement it satisfies.
Procurement
Uses the same structure to check whether a supplier has one.
Leadership
Sees where the absence of one is blocking a customer or a lender.
Start from the role you actually hold
30 minutes with a senior practitioner who has done your job before building this.