Ratings, filled from the same Twin
Ratings gate buyer qualification and shape financing terms, but they take weeks of internal preparation every cycle and the result is rarely predictable.
A rating is not a standard. Nobody certifies you and there is nothing to conform to. Someone scores you, and the score follows you commercially. So the work is not proving conformance, it is making sure the evidence you already have is presented where the points actually are.
EcoVadis, S&P, Sustainalytics and CDP
EcoVadis
21 criteria across four themes, scored 0 to 100, with medals that customers ask for by name.
CDP Climate and Water
A disclosure system with score bands from D minus to A, driven by investors and increasingly by customers.
S&P Global CSA
The assessment behind the Dow Jones indices, with its own structure and weighting.
Sustainalytics and others
The same underlying data, reshaped again for another scoring methodology.
Blocking issues surface before you submit, not after
Answer fills each assessment from the Twin with source-cited evidence, reusing the same evidence across frameworks. Incomplete answers, contradictions between submissions and lost-point opportunities are flagged while there is still time to fix them.
Consistency across raters
Your CDP answer and your EcoVadis answer stop contradicting each other.
Evidence attached
Every claim links to the document behind it, which is what reviewers look for.
Year on year
Last cycle's submission becomes the starting point for the next, not a blank page.
beSirius gave us the structure and visibility we were missing. It turned EcoVadis from a stressful exercise into a process we actually control.
Haro Coolen, Sustainability Director, 3A Composites
Iveco Group runs EcoVadis, CDP and local ratings off the same Twin, and reads which topics come up most across all of them.
Check the draft before you send it
Upload your current response and see where the points are going.