Start with the current requirement
Use the standard, due diligence criteria, reporting template or assessment your team needs to answer.
beSirius checks your existing policies, audits, site reports, supplier records and other evidence against the requirement you are working on.
Use the standard, due diligence criteria, reporting template or assessment your team needs to answer.
beSirius links potentially relevant evidence to each requirement and keeps the source document and passage behind the result.
The output is specific to the work: requirement-level readiness, supplier gaps, a current RMI file, or a source-linked draft response.
For standards and assurance programmes such as IRMA, the Consolidated Mining Standard Initiative (CMSI), Veramark (formerly Copper Mark), ResponsibleSteel, the Cyanide Code, RMAP, LBMA and other applicable schemes, beSirius checks site or facility evidence against the requirements and shows what is met, partially met or missing.
Supported by evidence, with the source document and passage attached.
Some evidence exists; the gap stays visible for follow-up.
No supporting evidence yet; add evidence, assign corrective work or investigate.
A single standard being developed by Veramark (formerly Copper Mark), ICMM, the Mining Association of Canada and the World Gold Council, which will replace their individual schemes. Final consultation closed in late 2025 and launch is expected during 2026.
If you hold or are working towards Veramark, TSM, the ICMM Performance Expectations or the Responsible Gold Mining Principles, your evidence maps forward.
beSirius checks existing facility evidence against the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM). Get source-linked self-assessments, identify gaps, map your internal tailings standards to GISTM and prepare improvement plans and audit packs.
This is preparation and internal assurance. beSirius does not perform the independent audit or award certification.
See the detailed workflow: Prepare for certification →
For OECD-aligned processes, LME requirements and company-specific due diligence criteria, beSirius checks the available supplier or counterparty evidence, keeps the source behind each result and lists the requirements that still need follow-up.
If the current evidence does not answer a criterion, that item stays open rather than being filled with an assumption. Your team can follow up on those specific gaps instead of sending the supplier another full questionnaire.
See the detailed workflow: Assess suppliers and counterparties →
beSirius reuses known supplier and facility data, collects missing inputs, flags facility or answer validation issues and prepares the current RMI template for review.
For CMRT, EMRT and AMRT, the workflow can flag incorrect facility identifiers, contradictory answers and broken validations before generating the current template for review and submission. The supplier record stays available for the next reporting cycle or customer request.
See the detailed workflow: RMI automation →
beSirius retrieves potentially relevant policies, metrics, reports and previous responses, links them to the assessment questions and flags unsupported or inconsistent items before submission.
The review flags unanswered fields, missing evidence, inconsistent answers and support that does not match the assessed entity or reporting period. Your team receives a source-linked draft to check before submission.
See the detailed workflow: Ratings and scored assessments →
Supplier assessments and questionnaires issued by individual OEMs, banks and buyers. These are not published standards, and they make up a large share of incoming requests. beSirius handles them the same way as published ones.
See the detailed workflow: Answer customer and KYC requests →
Where a disclosure or regulatory requirement is used as an internal assessment framework, beSirius can check company, site, supplier and operational records against it and keep unsupported items open for evidence, interpretation or action.
Each result keeps the supporting source. Your team remains responsible for legal interpretation, the final disclosure and any regulatory filing.
See the detailed workflow: Run internal assurance →
Where a regulation is used as an internal assessment framework, beSirius checks company, site, supplier and operational records against it and keeps unsupported items open.
See the detailed workflow: Run internal assurance →
A policy, audit, site record or supplier document may be relevant to more than one requirement. beSirius keeps the source separate from the last format it was used in so the evidence can be checked again without assuming that one standard automatically satisfies another.
Stores source documents and structured evidence for a company, site, supplier or other entity, with each piece of evidence connected to its source.
Compare requirements, find relevant evidence in the Twin, check what is supported or missing, and prepare the assessment or response for review.
Returns the result appropriate to the requirement: requirement-level findings, evidence mapping, gaps, follow-up items, a source-linked draft response or a reporting template for review.
beSirius does not award certification, perform independent audits, grant formal equivalency, guarantee a rating outcome or make the final legal interpretation.