Skip to main content
    CDP & Reporting

    CDP 2025: Why the 2024 Changes Still Matter

    Understanding the 2024 changes and how they affect 2025 submissions.

    Galina DonnikGalina Donnik Chief Impact Officer
    July 16, 2025 6 min read

    Quick answer

    The 2024 CDP overhaul still shapes 2025 and 2026 submissions: the combined questionnaire, new platform and revised scoring stay in place. This page covers what carries over and what to do about it.

    Who this is for: Sustainability and disclosure teams planning their next CDP response and wondering which 2024 changes still apply.

    Analyze your CDP score

    CDP 2025 maintains the same structure as in 2024 with only minor tweaks for clarity. But if you're submitting this year, you're still dealing with the major framework overhaul. Whether you navigated last year's changes or are facing them for the first time, understanding what shifted is essential for a strategic approach to the submission.

    Here's what changed in 2024, why it's still impacting 2025 submissions, and how the most effective sustainability teams are adapting.

    A single disclosure framework: more ambition, more complexity

    In 2024, CDP merged its climate, water, and forests questionnaires into a unified disclosure framework. The 2025 questionnaire retains this overall structure, providing consistency for organizations.

    In theory: unified and efficient.
    In practice: more work and uncertainty for most companies with limited upside.

    What's different:

    Overlap between topics introduces duplicate answers in new sections

    Broad, catch-all questions make it harder to respond with nuance

    Sector-specific guidance is still evolving, leaving many unsure what applies

    For industrial companies not directly managing forests or water basins, this adds non-material workload with little relevance.

    New scoring logic introduced in 2024: fewer A's, more head-scratching

    The 2024 CDP results caught many teams off guard with sharp score drops (read more about last year's scores), even with better data and governance in place. This new scoring methodology continues into 2025, meaning teams are still grappling with these changes.

    What's changed:

    Greater emphasis on granular evidence, quantitative metrics, and integration

    Strong narrative answers are no longer enough without linked performance indicators

    Heavier penalties for missing methodology-specific terms or framing

    The frustration: Teams with mature programs are scoring worse, and no one knows why.

    Score dropped without warning?

    See exactly where the points were lost

    Run your last submission against CDP's methodology — free analysis, prioritised roadmap.

    Analyze my score

    Paywalls, limited feedback, and reduced transparency

    CDP now puts more behind a paywall:

    Score breakdowns

    Peer comparisons

    Historical answer analysis

    That's made it harder to improve performance and harder to justify the effort internally. Several sustainability leads we've spoken to say this year's submission felt more like a shot in the dark. Read more about how sustainability teams are feeling now.

    What sustainability leaders are doing now

    Mapping materiality first

    They align CDP effort with what matters for their business and stakeholders. Not every section deserves equal weight.

    Using automation to handle structure, not strategy

    Leaders use AI platforms like beSirius to pre-fill questions, track methodology changes, and cite data sources, freeing up their teams to focus on quality and positioning.

    Treating CDP as output, not strategy

    Submissions are a byproduct of solid internal data and impact work, not the starting point.

    Questioning the value

    Some teams are reassessing whether the time invested in CDP matches the business benefits given reduced transparency and higher complexity.

    Final take

    CDP still holds weight in certain circles. The major structural changes introduced in 2024 are here to stay, with 2025 maintaining consistency in most areas. But CDP needs to evolve quickly if it wants to remain relevant. Until then, top sustainability teams are taking control of their narratives, their disclosures, and their time.

    Don't wait for CDP to fix itself. Start making it work for you.

    Want to see how smart automation can cut your CDP time in half while increasing quality? Book a demo to try our CDP module on your real documents.

    Make CDP work for you

    See the CDP module on your real documents

    Cut CDP time in half while increasing quality — walk through the platform with our team.

    Book a demo
    Galina Donnik

    About the author

    Galina Donnik

    Chief Impact Officer

    Galina Donnik is a sustainability strategist with over a decade of expertise in metals and mining. She led consulting and assurance projects at PwC for several years, and the ESG transformation in ERG, a $10bn global mining company, where she drove the sustainability strategy, built a green finance framework aligned with the EU Taxonomy, and embedded responsible sourcing into procurement operations. Under her leadership, the company achieved an EcoVadis Platinum rating and received the Sustainability Award from the International Chromium Development Association. Galina brings a rare combination of strategic depth and operational experience, with a clear focus on turning sustainability requirements into practical, decision-ready processes for complex value chains.

    More from the blog

    Ready to see beSirius in action

    Book a demo to see how beSirius helps sustainability, compliance, and procurement teams work with better data.