Skip to main content
    CDP & Reporting

    What happened to the CDP 2024 scores?

    Why scores dropped, what sustainability leaders tell us, and what it means for the year ahead.

    Galina DonnikGalina Donnik Chief Impact Officer
    July 15, 2025 5 min read

    Quick answer

    CDP 2024 scores came in lower across the board. This page explains what changed in the scoring methodology, why many companies dropped a band, and what it means for the next disclosure cycle.

    Who this is for: Sustainability, ESG reporting and investor-relations teams that disclose to CDP and have to explain a score movement internally.

    See how your CDP score is scored

    This year's CDP results hit differently. Across sectors, even among historically strong performers, sustainability teams found themselves staring at unexpected "C" or "D" scores. In many cases, nothing material changed in their programs, but something had clearly shifted in the system.

    So what happened?

    2024 brought a quiet but significant methodology update. And with it came new challenges, rising expectations, and a serious rethink of how companies approach disclosure.

    See it on your data

    Find out why your CDP score dropped

    Run a free pre-submission check with the beSirius CDP Scoring Analysis tool and see exactly where points were lost.

    Analyze my scores

    What changed in the scores?

    Leaders we speak to across mining, metals, industrials, and manufacturing are describing three main shifts:

    Score declines across the board

    Even companies with mature reporting structures and year-over-year improvements dropped from A/B to C/D.

    Heavier penalties for gaps

    Blank sections, partial disclosures, or missing supplier data now result in bigger score drops.

    Earlier submission bottlenecks

    Those who waited to submit closer to the deadline ran into more technical issues, and often had less support.

    Why it matters

    A CDP score isn't just a vanity metric. It impacts:

    Financing terms

    Green loans, ESG-linked credit lines

    Procurement eligibility

    Customer platforms increasingly require it

    Internal trust

    Boards and executives want to see progress

    So when a team that's worked hard all year sees a lower score with no clear explanation, the damage isn't just reputational, but it's both personal and strategic.

    What sustainability leaders are telling us

    Across industries, CSOs and ESG leads are raising concerns. Not about disclosure itself, but about the usability, clarity, and return on effort. Here's what we're hearing:

    "We spent 2.5 months preparing, only to get a lower score than when we submitted a quick draft three years ago."
    "No one explained what actually changed. We just got a lower grade and a bill."
    "The system feels built for consultants, not companies. If you don't outsource, you're at a disadvantage."
    "We'd keep doing CDP, but only if it serves a bigger purpose, like investor confidence or strategic benchmarking. Right now, it's just draining."

    There's a sense of fatigue. It's not about climate action, but about reporting that doesn't translate into insight, finance, or competitive advantage.

    What does this mirror do, professor? — CDP submission meme

    The real tension

    What's happening is a classic maturity shift:

    CDP is trying to increase rigor and relevance

    Companies are trying to balance budgets, deadlines, and strategic value

    The gap between what's asked and what's rewarded has grown too wide

    Many CSOs describe CDP as "still valuable in theory", but increasingly disconnected from the business cases they need to make internally.

    Where do we go from here?

    The shift in scores isn't the end of CDP, but it is a wake-up call. If the platform wants to remain relevant (especially to industrial players) it needs to:

    Provide clearer guidance before score changes happen

    Show real value beyond ratings

    Such as links to financing or customer wins

    Embrace automation partners

    To reduce the burden on already stretched teams

    And for sustainability teams: it's time to ask where your effort is going, and what systems actually help you operate faster, smarter, and with greater strategic impact.

    To handle exactly this shift, we built a CDP module that cuts prep time by 50% and helps you avoid the usual web portal traps. Save months of work with beSirius and let your team focus on strategic decisions.

    Run a free pre-submission check with our CDP Scoring Analysis tool or download the CDP Success Toolkit 2025.

    Ready when you are

    Cut CDP prep time in half

    See how beSirius handles the CDP grind so your team can focus on strategic decisions.

    Book a demo
    Galina Donnik

    About the author

    Galina Donnik

    Chief Impact Officer

    Galina Donnik is a sustainability strategist with over a decade of expertise in metals and mining. She led consulting and assurance projects at PwC for several years, and the ESG transformation in ERG, a $10bn global mining company, where she drove the sustainability strategy, built a green finance framework aligned with the EU Taxonomy, and embedded responsible sourcing into procurement operations. Under her leadership, the company achieved an EcoVadis Platinum rating and received the Sustainability Award from the International Chromium Development Association. Galina brings a rare combination of strategic depth and operational experience, with a clear focus on turning sustainability requirements into practical, decision-ready processes for complex value chains.

    More from the blog

    Ready to see beSirius in action

    Book a demo to see how beSirius helps sustainability, compliance, and procurement teams work with better data.